nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification paper
2025 01 v.43 17-22+28
3.0 T MRI动态增强+多b值DWI对直肠癌良恶性淋巴结的鉴别及与血管侵犯的关联性探究
基金项目(Foundation): 河北省医学科学研究课题计划(20231368)
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
中文作者单位:

承德医学院附属医院放射科;天津市天津医院超声科;

摘要(Abstract):

目的:评估3.0T磁共振成像(MRI)技术,包括动态增强(DCE)和多b值扩散加权成像(DWI),鉴别其在直肠癌良恶性淋巴结中的应用价值,并探讨其成像参数与直肠癌血管侵犯之间的相关性。方法:回顾性分析2021年3月至2023年3月期间医院收治的122例直肠癌患者的临床资料。所有患者均接受3.0T DCE‐MRI和多b值DWI检查,以肠镜活检或术后组织病理检查作为确诊标准,比较DCE‐MRI和多b值DWI与常规MRI在鉴别直肠癌淋巴结性质方面的诊断效能,并分析其成像参数与血管侵犯状态之间的关联。结果:在122例患者中,通过病理检查确认恶性淋巴结43例(35.25%),良性淋巴结79例(64.75%)。DCE‐MRI和多b值DWI在诊断直肠癌淋巴结性质方面的灵敏度、特异度、准确度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值均高于常规MRI(P<0.05)。此外,血管侵犯阳性组在T分期、CEA水平、Ktrans值和Kep值方面显著高于阴性组,而ADC值则较低(P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析表明,高ADC值与血管侵犯阴性相关,而高T分期、CEA水平、Ktrans值和Kep值与血管侵犯阳性相关(P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,ADC值、Ktrans值和Kep值对预测直肠癌血管侵犯具有一定价值(AUC分别为0.791、0.848、0.874)。结论:DCE‐MRI和多b值DWI在鉴别直肠癌淋巴结的良恶性方面表现出较高的诊断效能,并且这些成像参数与血管侵犯的存在密切相关。特别是,ADC值、Ktrans值和Kep值能够有效预测直肠癌患者的血管侵犯风险,为临床治疗决策提供重要的参考依据。

关键词(KeyWords): 直肠癌;良恶性淋巴结;磁共振;动态增强成像;扩散加权成像;鉴别诊断;血管侵犯
参考文献

[1] Yoshioka T,Hasegawa H,Ikeda K,et al. Efficacy of transperineal minimally invasive surgery with laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision for lower rectal cancer[J]. Surg Today,2023,53(4):490-498.

[2] Lin N,Wei Y C,Wang R,et al. Ultrasound-assisted endoscopic nanocarbon tattoo before neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer is helpful for surgery[J]. Asian J Surg,2020,43(1):374-375.

[3] Iwama N,Tsuruta M,Hasegawa H,et al. Relationship between anastomotic leakage and CT value of the mesorectum in laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer[J]. Jpn J Clin Oncol,2020,50(4):405-410.

[4] Park S H,Cho S H,Choi S H,et al. MRI assessment of com plete response to preoperative chemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer:2020 guide for practice from the korean society of abdominal radiology[J]. Korean J Radiol, 2020, 21(7):812-828.

[5] Zunder S M,Perez-Lopez R,De Kok B M,et al. Correlation of the tumour-stroma ratio with diffusion weighted MRI in rectal cancer[J]. Eur J Radiol,2020,133:109345.

[6] Zou H H,Yu J,Wei Y,et al. Response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectum cancer:Texture analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging,2019,49(3):885-893.

[7]中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会.中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2020年版)[J].中华外科杂志,2020,58(8):561-585

[8]张鑫,江波,昝丽坤,等.代谢综合征对结直肠癌患者临床特征及预后的影响[J].中华全科医师杂志,2019,18(12):1141-1146.

[9] Lee T H,Kwak J M,Yu D Y,et al. Lower incidence of postoperative urinary retention in robotic total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer compared with laparoscopic surgery[J].Dig Surg,2022,39(2-3):75-82.

[10] Zhang X,Deng X,Li J,et al. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision combined with en-bloc seminal vesicle and prostate resection for rectal cancer after chemoradiotherapy[J]. ANZ J Surg,2020,90(12):E168-E171.

[11] Cianci R,Cristel G,Agostini A,et al. MRI for rectal cancer primary staging and restaging after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy:how to do it during daily clinical practice[J]. Eur J Radiol,2020,131:109238.

[12] Fornell-Perez R,Vivas-Escalona V,Aranda-Sanchez J,et al.Primary and post-chemoradiotherapy MRI detection of extramural venous invasion in rectal cancer:the role of diffusion-weighted imaging[J]. Radiol Med,2020,125(6):522-530.

[13] Lu Z,Wang L,Xia K,et al. Prediction of clinical pathologic prognostic factors for rectal adenocarcinoma:volumetric texture analysis based on apparent diffusion coefficient maps[J]. J Med Syst,2019,43(12):331.

[14] Ippolito D,Drago S G,Pecorelli A,et al. Role of dynamic perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in patients with local advanced rectal cancer[J]. World J Gastroenterol,2020,26(20):2657-2668.

[15] Bakke K M,Gr?vik E,Meltzer S,et al. Comparison of Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging and multiecho dynamic contrast-based MRI in rectal cancer[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging,2019,50(4):1114-1124.

[16] Zhao L,Liang M,Yang Y,et al. Histogram models based on intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging to predict nodal staging of rectal cancer[J]. Eur J Radiol,2021,142:109869.

[17] Attenberger U I,Tavakoli A,Stocker D,et al. Reduced and standard field-of-view diffusion weighted imaging in patients with rectal cancer at 3 T-comparison of image quality and apparent diffusion coefficient measurements[J]. Eur J Radiol,2020,131:109257.

[18] Nofal S,You Y N,Chang G J,et al. Residents entering Complex General Surgical Oncology fellowship lack confidence with pelvic MRI for rectal cancer:results of a needs assessment survey[J]. Am J Surg,2020,219(2):304-308.

[19] Alvfeldt G,Aspelin P,Blomqvist L,et al. Rectal cancer staging using MRI:adherence in reporting to evidence-based practice[J]. Acta Radiol,2020,61(11):1463-1472.

[20]刘立艳,刘佳宝,吕晗,等. MRI检出的壁外血管侵犯对直肠癌区域淋巴结转移的预测价值研究[J].实用放射学杂志,2020,36(1):57-60,131.

[21] Liu J,Li Q,Tang L,et al. Correlations of mean and mimimum apparent diffusion coefficient values with the clinicopathological features in rectal cancer[J]. Acad Radiol,2021,28Suppl 1:S105-S111.

[22] Fusco R,Granata V,Rega D,et al. Morphological and functional features prognostic factor of magnetic resonance imaging in locally advanced rectal cancer[J]. Acta Radiol,2019,60(7):815-825.

基本信息:

DOI:

中图分类号:R735.37;R445.2

引用信息:

[1]冯涛,许双燕,刘洋洋等.3.0 T MRI动态增强+多b值DWI对直肠癌良恶性淋巴结的鉴别及与血管侵犯的关联性探究[J].影像科学与光化学,2025,43(01):17-22+28.

基金信息:

河北省医学科学研究课题计划(20231368)

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文